Page 168 - The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1. Born in the USSR

ionized in the atmosphere and ozone which we needed so badly appeared. An

explanation amazing in its absurdity!

We can certainly assume that the journalist muddled something up, as they usually
do, but most likely, it happened because some “experts” gave him their “clear”
explanation of the phenomenon. And, if those “experts” did not appeal against this
explanation later, it meant that the journalist conveyed their opinion correctly. Let us
examine, what is behind their opinion. Maybe they are right?!

1989 was not a year of sun activity, as those “experts” allege. Let’s check this
affirmation. The sun has an eleven-year cycle of activity which was almost at the cyclic
minimum in 1990. Be-sides, inside this cycle there are local emissions even at minimal
sun activity. Indeed, the first local peak of the sun activity was in the middle of 1989,
and the second—in the beginning of 1991. But the appearance of ozone masses and
disappearance of the ozone hole happened at the very beginning of 1990—just between
these local peaks of sun activity. It was the first contradiction in the ex-planation, but
not the last and most important one.

Why did ozone appear with a more than half-year delay after a small peak of sun
activity in 1989? For some reason “experts” were reluctant to clear up this question. The
ozone hole disappeared precisely between those local peaks of sun activity in 1989 and
1991.

There is more nonsense related to this explanation. If we take the “experts” point
of view as a basis, it would mean that the sun activity in 1989 was exactly the same, as
the total activity of sun for 1.33 billion years. During this period there were 120 909 091

eleven-year cycles of sun activity. Accordingly, there were three times more cycles for
4.0 billion years which was required to create the complete ozone layer on Midgard-
earth, which our planet had until 1960, i.e., approximately, 362 727 273 cycles!

I would like to remind you that the ozone hole above Antarctica appeared as a result
of the “reasonable” activity of man, when the thickness of Midgard-earth’s ozone layer
diminished by 30%! The following question arises: why did it take more than a billion
years for nature to create 30% of the ozone layer, which man managed to destroy over a
period of 30 years? And there were 120 909 091 eleven-year cycles of the sun activity
for this period!

In what way did the peak of the sun activity of 1989 differ from other peaks which
occurred during 1.3 billion of years (or in other words during 120 909 091 cycles of the

sun activity)?! “Experts” cannot answer this question. Moreover, for very clear reasons
they prefer not to ask it at all.

If we assume that one and the same phenomenon happened both during the peak of
the sun’s activity in 1989 and during 120 909 091 cycles of sun activity over a period of
1.3 billions of years, it would mean that in 1989 our sun had become a supernova with
all the consequences that naturally follow. However, in 1989 our sun did not become a
supernova, which means that this version is no longer relevant. Moreover, there is
another reason, why this version ceased to have significance.

The point is that the power of the sun’s radiation is increased with every peak of
activity, including hard radiation. All that results in, is atmospheric oxygen being
ionized, in other words the atoms of oxygen become ions. And oxygen ions do not form
molecules of ozone (molecules of ozone consist of three atoms of oxygen)! Thus, no

Back to contents
168