Page 12 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

Siberia with only the clothes they wore when being thrown out of their homes. These
“voluntary migrants” were not sent to dwell in ready-made cottages in well-equipped
settlements, but to live “alfresco”, in the open country, more precisely in the virgin
taiga. People were detrained in the middle of the taiga and given one ax, one saw and
one shovel for the whole echelon. At the best, people had time to dig themselves into
earth. Few could survive the winter in these conditions.

Some can object, arguing that the party of Bolsheviks served the “proletariat”.
But for “some” reason they forget to specify that the party of social democrats (the
Bolsheviks faction) came from the bowels of Bund, which was a Judaic (Jewish) na-
tionalistic party, in other words, a Zionist party! There were almost NO workers and
peasants among Israelites! Is it really possible that this party devotedly “served” the
“revolutionary” class, the proletariat? However, all highly qualified workers were
the first people the Bolsheviks destroyed. This class, whose interests the Bolsheviks-
Leninists defended so zealously by means of the dictatorship of proletariat, was simp-
ly wiped out by them. “It is an obvious misunderstanding here”, some may say. But
there is no misunderstanding whatsoever; the fact of the matter is that skilled workers
did not need anyone defending their interests. They got a good salary, at times great-
er than their colleagues in the “developed” western countries. There were kindergar-
tens and day nurseries in their enterprises; they could afford to spend their holiday in
Italy, Greece, etc, which obviously did not coincide with the image of the oppressed
class which had “nothing to lose except for its own chains”. In order that there would
be no one who could appeal against this kind of “defense”, they were “simply” de-
stroyed, and then it was much easier to defend the interests of an already non-
existent class. It was a clever turn, wasn’t it?

This can be confirmed by the fact that at the moment of the revolution there
were twenty five thousand members in the Bolshevik party, almost all of whom were
professional revolutionaries, and the majority of them lived in immigration, being
in need of nothing, which required in those, not so distant times, considerable sums of
money. I would like to remind my readers that a professional revolutionary is en-
gaged only in the revolutionary activity and in nothing else. So, if there had been
workers in this party, they would have been only former ones. All party members
were professional revolutionaries whose “work” consisted in the undermining of the
existent political system and required enormous financial means. Therefore, bank
robberies and other similar methods used by the criminals-soldiers of the party (by
the way, Joseph Stalin was one of them) could introduce only a tiny share. The main
means for the Russian Revolution came from far away America and, oddly enough,
the American multimillionaires who played the role of Santa Claus for the Bolshe-
viks: again, these American multimillionaires for “some” reason were all Jews.

It turned out to be quite strange, the Great “Russian” Revolution, didn’t it? It
was prepared by Jews; it was performed by Jews; it was financed by Jews; the
country was headed by Jews after it. But, nevertheless, in all the history books it is
called the “Great” Russian Revolution!

There is another moment, which is also important. The revolution destroyed
mainly Russians and other Slavs. This is another “mix-up” of the “fathers” of the

Back to contents 12