Page 192 - The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1. Born in the USSR

someone else’s back”, therefore, I always aimed to have my financial independence

which allowed me to save my personal independence.

This state of affairs was convenient for our hosts—they could considerably cut
down their expenses on my group. Therefore, they supported and helped to organize my
work as much as they could. If necessary, Steuler’s interpreter helped me with translation
when I worked with “German” Germans.

We visited Porsche autos but my suggestions evoked no interest in “local”
engineers. The in-comprehensible caused rejection and non-acceptance. They were not
able to understand how a de-vice which was not connected directly to the engine system
of a car could influence it. For the disciplined brains of German engineers it was an
insoluble problem. As it turned out later—not only for German brains! Everything that
could not fit into the picture of the universe acknowledged by “the highest authorities”
has no right to exist. Despite the fact that the phenomenon exists and acts in reality, but
it is insignificant “trivia” which could be forgotten at once in order to re-establish one’s
peace of mind.

Nevertheless, I did acquire the new experience of socializing with foreigners. In
fact, I perceive many things telepathically. And telepathic perception does not have
linguistic limits. You simply attune yourself to the person and “see” what he thinks
about, what problems worry him, etc. Certainly, I did not have a detailed understanding
of this process then. Simply, a lot of people told me that I began to give answers to many
questions before they were asked. Therefore, it is some-times difficult for me to separate
thoughts that are spoken aloud, from those not yet voiced. I con-sider them all spoken,
as soon as they are in the head—a phenomenon which is not so obvious for most people.

Certainly, I do not “get” into the head of every person I meet. I consider that the
content of a brain is the personal business of the individual, independent of what position
he takes, and what he believes or disbelieves! But, when you converse with a person or
with the group of people, you automatically attune to their thoughts and begin to build
the explanation at a level that will be understood. Therefore, my explanation of the same

phenomenon is never the same and not because I am unable to repeat it, but because
different people have different levels of education and different capacities for analysis
and the grasping of new concepts.

It is impossible simply to remove the old “data-base” from a human brain, despite
the fact that it is false. It is necessary to find some areas of perception which exist in
both old and new bases; only after that, should one begin to build a new base which will
gradually oust the old one using these original “bridges”, and then give new explanations
for that, which already exists in the person’s brain. Also one should not do it too sharply,
because the brain of a living person has it own limits of flexibility. This is the only way
of enlightening by knowledge; therefore crossing these limits will do no good.

When the explanation is given to a group of people, it is necessary to “go through”
all variants of people’s perception and to build the explanation strategy so that as many

people as possible will understand it. Doing this, inevitably slows down the speed of
enlightenment, because you have taken into account the majority of listeners, in spite of
the fact that some of them are ready to perceive more. In order to avoid this situation (of
respecting only the interests of those who are less ready), you often need to apply a
“complex” method of passing “complex” knowledge.

Back to contents
192