Page 68 - The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1. Born in the USSR

of development and education of the person receiving, even with the telepathic

transformer available.

A thought-form does not consist of words. Words are sound analogues of thought-
forms. A human being does not reflect on the process of thinking, which is a process of
creation of thought-forms by the human brain. Thought-forms are volumetric holograms.
Sounds extracted by the vocal cords of a person are able to transmit the integrity of a
thought-form, however, within narrow limits; the poorer the idiolect of a person, the
greater the part of a received thought-form that is beyond verbalisation.

The brain of any person functions on the principle of similarity. It picks out words,
which images are the closest to what a thought-form contains. The more multilateral the
person, the greater the number of images to have their verbal equivalent, the more
completely and exactly, the more clearly and simply he can convey the meaning of a
thought-form, both of other civilizations and his own.

If a person were able to see the processes of thinking and those words with which
he tries to transmit his ideas to other people on other levels of the brain, he could see the
enormous difference even between his thought-form and the semantic content of the
words which convey this thought-form.

The multiplicity of the person’s development, his education and ability to think
abstractly and independently, determines the level of exactness and completeness with
which the verbal expression reflects a thought-form. Therefore, every person receives a
thought-form at his own evolutional level. This factor must be taken into account while
working with similar situations.

The following example can give clear idea of this phenomenon. If we take ten
absolutely different people and ask them to draw an apple placed on the table, there
won’t be a single drawing that would completely reflect the real apple. Besides, every
person will draw the apple to the extent of his or her artistic talent. The apple will be
different in each of these pictures, but any person, who does not see this apple, but who
knows what it is, will define without any problem what is in the picture, if the person
who drew it was in his right senses and drew the apple instead of something else.

* * *
By the way, about being in one’s right senses. When all the above happened, I did

not rush to draw hasty conclusions, although, I was enraptured of it. I considered that it
was necessary to understand it, first and foremost, for myself. Therefore, I decided to
make a thorough analysis of what happened and for this purpose I put forward several
possible explanations of the event, trying to take into account all possible variants. As a
result of the analysis I created several working hypotheses and carefully began to work
over each of them. These hypotheses were:

1. I went mad.
2. The rest of the people went mad.
3. It is a result of my hypnosis.

4. I was simply tricked.
5. The event was real.

Back to contents
68