Page 32 - The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1. Born in the USSR

when a person was a stubborn sceptic and, nevertheless, his problems “disappeared”

without a trace.

The changes in the human organism were very unusual. For example, one person
had long-term chronic stomach and duodenal ulcers… They disappeared after my work,
also all old ulcer scars disappeared too together with “fresh” ones. After my treatment
the doctors could not find any trace or symptoms of illness, the development of which
they had been observing for, sometimes, dozens of years. Atrophied organs became
absolutely healthy, for example, the cavities in lungs of a tuberculosis patient were not
found, etc.

It is of interest, that lime formations in lungs were not part of the living organism;
they appeared in the place of dead pulmonary tissue. After my treatment the dead tissue
found in the living tissue disappeared and lung tissue, dead years ago, reappeared where
nature intended. The dead tis-sue disappeared and the healthy tissue appeared so that no
one would even suspect that the lungs of that person had suffered any disorder, not least

tuberculosis…
* * *
Sometimes some things happened which I could understand much later. For
example, there were some stubborn sceptics among my fellow-students, who tried to
prove me wrong. One day I was requested to carry out an experiment, which was
intended to prove the “falseness” of my position. I was asked to define the illnesses of
my fellow-student Uri Karpenko. He stood in front of me, my eyes were blindfolded and
I began to scan his organism. My scanning was accompanied by the description of those
problems I found. I felt his organs and his presence in front of me.

When I finished, the bandage was taken off and ... he was not where he had been
before I was blindfolded. I was surprised, because I felt his presence very clearly while
he was not there. Thus, they tried to prove the falseness of my experiments, but for some
reason none acknowledged the fact that I had described all his problems very precisely.
They only paid attention to the fact that he abandoned the place where he was at the
beginning of the experiment and I continued to describe his state of health.

Then I had heard nothing about Kirlian’s photography and did not understand that
a person, as well as any other living creature, left his imprint in the place where he stayed
even for a second. The more time spent staying motionless on a spot, the longer the
conservation of the imprint. There-fore, if one manages to tune-in to the place where this
person was, it is possible to “read” any in-formation about him and not only about the
state of his health...

Later I understood and proved in practice that it was possible to obtain any
information about the individual from his photo, voice, image, and not only when I saw
or heard him personally, but also when someone else did it and had only to think of this
person. I always adhered to the ethical side of this matter. I consider it permissible to do
this kind of review only as a rare exception and when the person concerned asks me to
do it. The only other exception I would understandably make would be a threat to my
life, the life of my nearest and dearest or any other person. In all other cases, a person
has the right to inviolability in his personal life...

* * *

Back to contents
32