Page 35 - The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1
P. 35

Nicolai Levashov. The Mirror of My Soul. Vol. 1. Born in the USSR

           Tretyakov  simply  caught  something familiar  in  my  mumbling  in  the  hubbub  of the
           recess. Later, when we were assigned to different chairs, I got to the chair of theoretical

           radio physics which he headed then. I would like to say some good words about this
           man. To my mind he was the real scientist.

                Unfortunately, I didn’t have a lot of opportunities to talk to him. He was very busy
           and guided the term papers and degree theses of other students. We conversed several
           times including about my personal researches of human abilities. He had no scepticism;
           he  was  open  to  new  ideas.  Once,  when  we  conversed  on  issues  of  physics  he  said
           something which I remember to this day: “Never stand on the “rails” of one or another
           theory. Their creators were not fools and squeezed out of their idea everything they
           could. If you do not want to pick up the “crumbs” of their ideas, always be outside of
           them and never “within”. Only then you will be able to see their omissions and maybe
           go further than they.” I memorized these words forever, they entirely resonated with my
           own concepts and subconsciously I always followed them even when I did not realise
           it...

                                                         * * *
                I had already studied two years at the university, getting “excellent” on almost all
           my exams, but classical science failed to answer my questions, which appeared as early
           as in my secondary school. I began my own search for truth in my third year. In my
           fourth and fifth years I was convinced of the rightness of the way I had chosen. Over
           three years I succeeded in finding answers to questions which had given me no rest from
           my childhood. I did not have yet the whole “picture”, but I felt that I had chosen the right
           way. I continued the search for the truth through the cognition of my own abilities.

                Sometimes I had to participate in “blind” experiments. In one of such experiments
           I was asked to define an object in the room. I began to scan with my hand and felt some
           energy. I felt the limits of gradients, etc. Then I was told that I had defined quite exactly
           the magnetic lines of a little magnet placed under the sofa.

                So,  unexpectedly  for  me,  I  knew  that  I  could  feel  the  magnetic  field,  and,
           consequently, electromagnetic and electric fields. It was considered before that a human
           being could not feel them, let alone to distinguish force lines. More pieces of the mosaic
           were put into a unified picture, but I did not “mature” yet. Meanwhile the time came to
           present my degree thesis; I stopped my researches to be fully engaged in it.

                Mainly, my thesis was based on the formulas of mathematical physics. I felt no ring
           of truth in the mathematical mind-games, but did everything, that was required for the

           thesis. On my fifth year I was asked to write a thesis on economics. The teachers of the
           economic faculty saw a spark in my arguments concerning economy. When I found out
           that I had to pass several additional examinations on subjects that we did not study
           according to the program of our faculty, I decided to reject the offer. I was simply too
           lazy to spend my time preparing for additional examinations. For five years we had had
           to  pass  about  fifty  examinations  and  approximately  the  same  quantities  of  tests.
           Sometimes I feel sorry that I rejected this offer and did not write the thesis on economics.

                One way or another, I prepared my thesis, passed the examination on Scientific
                         9
           Communism , getting “excellent”. For my thesis I received “good”, although I do not

           9  Scientific Communism was one of the three major ingredients of Marxism-Leninism as taught in the Soviet Union in all
           institutions of higher education and pursued in the corresponding research institutions, and departments. The discipline
           Back to contents
                                                            35
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40